000 02900nam a22003257a 4500
003 OSt
005 20240506054546.0
008 240501b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _bEnglish.
_cCvSU-CCAT Campus Library.
_erda.
050 _aUM TA 1637
_bM88 2019
100 _aMutia, Kim Brian, author.
_911846
245 _aMediLeaf : a Herbal Plant Classification System using Image Processing /
_cKim Brian Mutia, Keysha R. Pareja, and Carla Angelica A. Maghirang.
260 _aRosario, Cavite :
_bCavite State University-CCAT Campus,
_c2019.
300 _axiii, 76 leaves :
_billustrations ;
_c28 cm
500 _aAn Undergraduate Thesis (BSCos) -- Cavite State University-CCAT Campus, 2019.
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references and appendices.
520 _aMUTIA, KIM BRIAN, PAREJA, KEYSHA R., MAGHIRANG, CARLA ANGELICA R. MediLeaf: A Herbal Plant Classification System Using Image Processing. Cavite State University-CCAT, Rosario, Cavite. May 2019. Adviser: Prof. Christopher G. Estonilo. The study was conducted from August 2018 to April 2019 at the Department of Computer Studies of Cavite State University-CCAT. The general objective of the study was to assist users in identifying the type of herbal plant using computer vision. Specifically, the study aimed to: 1) design and develop the system of identifying the type of herbal plant which is capable of importing and capturing leaf image, and identifying the type of imported or captured leaf image; 2) providing the information and benefits of the herbal plant; 3) evaluate the system in order to determine if it complies with the ISO- IE 25010 software evaluation standards; and prepare an implementation plan for the deployment of the system in the Department of Computer Studies of CvSU-CCAT. The system analysis and design of MediLeaf applied the rapid application development or RAD software development model which was composed of requirement analysis, user design (prototype, test, refine), construction, and cutover. The system was evaluated by five (5) IT experts and ten (10) general end-user in the campus. It gained a mean of 4.49 and described as very satisfactory for the system developer respondents. On the other hand, it gained a mean of 4.58 and described as excellent for the end-users.
546 _aIn English text.
650 _aHerb species recognition.
_911847
650 _aComputer vision.
_95544
650 _aPlant identification.
_911848
650 _aImage processing -- Digital techniques.
_911802
650 _aComputer graphics.
_9298
700 _aPareja, Keysha R., author.
_911849
700 _aMaghirang, Carla Angelica A., author.
_911850
700 _aEstonilo, Christopher G., adviser.
_95822
700 _aNabablit, Karlo Jose E., technical critic.
_99160
942 _2lcc
_cT/M/D
_hTA 1637 M88 2019
_kUM
999 _c3247
_d3247